<Autofrwd>SAMBA digest 1913

[Chris Woodhouse]

Good one Pete ~S~

i hope its a jke and not a grim reality ~S~

> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba at samba.org [mailto:samba at samba.org]
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 1998 6:24 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: <Autofrwd>SAMBA digest 1913
> 
> 
> Sender: samba at samba.org
> Received: from kong.bstc.net (kong.bstc.net [207.239.221.11])
> 	by arl-img-3.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.17) with 
> SMTP id BAA14897
> 	for <113315.450 at compuserve.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 
> 01:24:09 -0500 (EST)
> Received: (qmail 3913 invoked from network); 18 Dec 1998 
> 06:18:12 -0000
> Received: from samba.anu.edu.au (150.203.164.44)
>   by kong.bstc.net with SMTP; 18 Dec 1998 06:18:12 -0000
> Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:10413 "HELO" ident: 
> "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]") by samba.anu.edu.au with SMTP id 
> <12630954-471>; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 17:07:15 +1100
> Message-Id: <3679EEE8.40E09A54 at sgi.com>
> Errors-To: listproc-errors at samba.anu.edu.au
> Reply-To: samba at samba.org
> Originator: samba at samba.org
> Sender: samba at samba.org
> Precedence: bulk
> From: samba at samba.org
> To: Multiple recipients of list <samba at samba.org>
> Subject: SAMBA digest 1913
> X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios 
> Kotsikonas
> X-URL: http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc
> X-Comment: Discussion of Samba software package
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
> boundary="------------B3FE6B832169ED456828FD21"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32)
> Date: 	Fri, 18 Dec 1998 17:07:15 +1100
> 
> Here is a current listing of the parameters that can be changed
> by SWAT in each of the 3 pages.  A "no" means it does not
> appear in that page. "BASIC" means it shows in the basic view.
> "ADVANCED" means it only shows in the advanced view
> (unless its value is non default, in which case it shows in the
> basic view as well).
> 
> Do people think this is the right settings for each of the
> parameters? Do we need to move any of the "ADVANCED"
> entries to the "BASIC" page? Do we need to add any that
> are listed as "no"?
> 
> Inquiring minds want to know......
>