samldb and associated patches

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:58 +0200, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> I've reworked the patchset:
> 
>     * Patches until 196e1dfcfece636054a224cc5bd2904704671530 should work
>       without problems (cosmetics and some enhancements to the SAMLDB
>       primary group detection)
>     * Patches until aca7270d7fc478385a933c81c3b1cc5d14e8da79 should also
>       work (makes the most of the rootDSE attributes dynamic - I had to
>       leave "dsServiceName" static for now since otherwise s4 stops working)
>     * The patches afterwards fixes the delete operation. I found out
>       that beginning with DC functional level >= 2008_R2 we need to make
>       use of the SHOW_RECYCLED and not SHOW_DELETED control to find
>       always all entries. Since otherwise recycled objects aren't
>       handled. These patches try to fix this - would be nice if you
>       could take a look if my thoughts are right.
> 
> It would be nice if you could start applying at least some parts. But 
> probably a "make test" is still useful.

I'm rather confused as to exactly what commits you have prepared that
are a tested and cohesive set.  Can you prepare me a tree, which passes
'make test' that you want to me to merge?

Once you let me know exactly which of these patches you want merged, and
which pass 'make test', I can look at it.  

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett


-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100920/ea60b369/attachment.pgp>