Remove smbwrapper?
David Collier-Brown
David.Collier-Brown at Sun.COM
Tue Jan 3 15:11:03 GMT 2006
Maybe we should discuss this off-list...
--dave
derrell at samba.org wrote:
> "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <jerry at samba.org> writes:
>
>
>>On Sun, 25 Dec 2005, David Collier-Brown wrote:
>>
>>
>>> It works fine on Solaris 8 through 10, but I haven't built it lately
>>>because it defaults to off instead of auto in Configure. That
>>>discourages me from noticing bugs, you see (;-))
>>>
>>> As it happens, it only uses a small subset of the functionality of
>>>loadparm, and therefor doesn't need the dependency on tdb that the samba
>>>server requires. Indeed, it seems odd to me that it depend on smb.conf
>>>at all! It's not a server, after all.
>>
>>I think the issue more than anything else is that smbwrapper (the current
>>code, not derrell's) has no maintainer and hasn't been developed since
>>tridge dropped it back in the 2.0 days I think.
>>
>>I would support removing it an replacing it with derrell's new version
>>just to ease support efforts.
>
>
> The only problem with this concept is that then people will use it, and I'll
> have to support it. :-)
>
> The biggest difference from what used to exist in the original version is with
> smbsh: chdir does not work properly in my version. The user's selection of
> current directory doesn't "stick" and since I have never had a need to use it
> that way, I've never gotten around to figuring out why. I recall that it was
> a somewhat non-trivial issue.
>
> Then again, if no one has been using the original version, no one will expect
> it to work. :-)
>
> Derrell
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
davecb at canada.sun.com | -- Mark Twain
(416) 263-5733 (x65733) |
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list