CVS update: samba4/source/librpc/idl
Simo Sorce
simo.sorce at xsec.it
Wed Nov 19 18:00:54 GMT 2003
To me the two syntaxes seem equivalent, where's the difference?
/simo's mind obfuscated at the end of the day
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 19:29, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Hmmm, the IDL for NetrShareEnum seems wrong. For example, Ethereal, which
> dissects this correctly, and follows MSDN in its naming conventions, has
> it as:
>
> /*
> * IDL long NetrShareEnum(
> * IDL [in] [string] [unique] wchar_t *ServerName,
> * IDL [in] [out] [ref] SHARE_ENUM_STRUCT *share,
> * IDL [in] long MaxLen,
> * IDL [out] long Entries,
> * IDL [in] [out] [unique] long *ResumeHandle
> * IDL );
> */
>
> while the above change has it as:
>
> /******************/
> /* Function: 0x24 */
> WERROR srvsvc_NetShareEnum(
> [in] unistr *server_unc,
> [in,out] srvsvc_NetShareCtr ctr,
> [in] uint32 preferred_len,
> [out] uint32 total,
> [in,out] uint32 *resume_handle
> );
>
> Regards
> -----
> Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
> sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
--
Simo Sorce - simo.sorce at xsec.it
Xsec s.r.l. - http://www.xsec.it
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
mobile: +39 329 328 7702
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list