"NTLMv2 Response (Only)" yields Unicode password length of 78

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 05:24, Ken Cross wrote:
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:56 PM
> >
> > We have had LMv2 code available for a while (thanks to the 
> > TNG folk) but 
> > there was little impetus to push ahead with it.  Few people 
> > have asked.  
> > You're one of the few.  :)
> > 
> > 
> > Chris -)-----
> > 
> 
> 
> FWIW, here's one more vote to support NT LMv2.  We have a customer that
> is going to restrict all users to LMv2 only.  That breaks Samba 3.0
> pretty badly.


??

I have had NTLMv2 in 3.0 for over a year, and LMv2 for months now.  It's
been fully supported inside NTLMSSP for ages too.

I would be very interested to hear how it's failing.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet at pcug.org.au
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  abartlet at samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet at hawkerc.net
http://samba.org     http://build.samba.org     http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20030411/2d170cb3/attachment.bin