smb://
Welsh, Armand
armand.welsh at sscims.com
Thu Dec 28 20:29:16 GMT 2000
-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Kevin Colby [mailto:kevinc at grainsystems.com]
-> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 9:49 AM
-> To: Christopher R. Hertel
-> Cc: Simo Sorce; Allen, Michael B (RSCH); Richard Sharpe;
-> Steve Langasek;
-> Samba Technical
-> Subject: Re: smb://
->
-> Great. That simplifies things to this:
->
-> (known server)
-> smb://[[domain/]user[:password]@]server/[share/[path/]]
-> (browse workgrp) smb://workgroup/
-> (browse default) smb://
->
I like this format. It make logical sense.
-> use ":" and "@", I see no choice but this:
->
-> smb://[[domain;]user[:password]@]server/[share/[path/]]
->
I don't like this. It's non-intuitive, and just tries to make the URI
easier to parse, w/o looking at the whole URI. If the @ exists in the URI,
then what if the is a / to the left of it, the slash seperates the domain
from the username[:password] fields. If there is no @ in the URI, then no
domain should be specified, unless the domain is what is being browsed. It
makes sense to me anyways...
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list