Silly me.
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at NTS.Umn.EDU
Thu May 14 04:00:10 GMT 1998
Andrew,
Okay, good. If anyone *does* find such a beast *please* let me know. I
can work around that too, but it's more of a pain.
I've fixed the ubiqx modules so that they don't use signed char (easy).
I'm still testing but it all looks right. The next thing to do is work
out a fix for the NULL issue that meets everyone's needs & expectations.
Perhaps what I need from you, Andrew, is a better idea of what the Samba
includes.h is supposed to be. As I said before, I was told to put the
ubiqx headers in there. Is that really what is wanted?
I could use some more background.
Chris -)-----
> > So, my question (to Andrew, I guess, since he knows this stuff cold
> > anyway) is: Are there any systems out there that don't like "unsigned
> > char"?
>
> not that I know of!
>
> in fact, I was surprised to find one that didn't like "signed
> char". Just shows you how broken some compilers are :)
>
> Cheers, Andrew
>
--
Christopher R. Hertel -)----- University of Minnesota
crh at nts.umn.edu Networking and Telecommunications Services
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list