Using 2.0.7 vs. 2.2.0-alpha3
Dan Perik
dan_perik-work at ntm.org.pg
Sun Apr 8 23:16:28 GMT 2001
Hello,
I'm working on evaluating Linux/Samba for use in our organization, and I
need some input. We have roughly 70 clients on our network, which are
either Win9x or WinNT/2000. We are currently using Novell Netware 4.x
for our file server/print server/etc.. We now have 2 Win 2000 servers
dedicated to our soon-to-be implemented accounting system. And we have
Linux hosting our e-mail and everything to do with it. We're looking at
simplifying our system, which will most likely mean dropping the Novell
system. So I'm evaluating using Linux/Samba vs. Win 2000 as our
file/print server. Since we have WinNT/2000 clients, and I'm needing
domain logins, I believe I need to run 2.2.0. But it's alpha. If I
can't have domain logins for WinNT/2000 clients, we may have to decide
to go Win2000 as our file server (much to my dismay). So my question is
how alpha is 2.2.0-alpha3? Is it stable enough to trust our file
serving to for all our operations? I mainly need the domain logins for
logon scripts and possibly roaming profiles under WinNT/2000. I also
need the ease of creating machine accounts automatically (which I just
got working yesterday). Basically, in order to prove to the other guys
that I'm working with that we should go Linux/Samba instead of Win2000,
I have to prove that it's stable, easy to administer, and works well.
What can you tell me?
- Dan Perik
--
- Dan Perik
Computer Services Department
Lapilo Center
New Tribes Mission - PNG
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list