retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe

[Wayne Davison]

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:21 PM, tom raschel <raschel at edvantice.de> wrote:

> so i had a look at --inplace which I thougt could do the trick, but inplace
> is updating the timestamp and if the script start a retransfer after a
> broken pipe it fails because the --inplace file is newer than the original
> file of the sender.
>

Are you using --update (-u)?  If so, turn that off.  If not, rsync won't
skip a file that is newer, so something else is afoot.

..wayne..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20091213/36a21b8f/attachment.html>