To inc_recurse or not to inc_recurse? [Re: 3.0.0pre2: bookend breakage (2 different errors)]

[Matt McCutchen]

On 10/16/07, Wayne Davison <wayned at samba.org> wrote:
> Yeah, I agree that it is better for the client to explicitly tell the
> server what is going on (and allows a batch file to indicate what is
> happening too).

Now you could revert the unconditional sending of --detect-renamed in
detect-renamed.diff; the new detect-renamed.diff is attached.

Matt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: detect-renamed.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 21889 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20071016/5da2bf85/detect-renamed.bin