[PATCH] Batch-mode rewrite

[Chris Shoemaker]

There it goes...

On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:16:45AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 04:40:39PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Do you see any reason to keep FIXED_CHECKSUM_SEED around?  It doesn't
> > hurt anthing, but I don't see a use for it.
> 
> You're right -- the new batchfile setup works fine without hard-wiring a
> checksum_seed value since the checksum is in the batchfile.  It has even
> been suggested previously that a hard-wired value could be a bad thing
> in certain circumstances, so I'm all in favor of getting rid of it.
> 
> ..wayne..
-------------- next part --------------
Index: options.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/options.c,v
retrieving revision 1.157
diff -u -r1.157 options.c
--- options.c	20 Jun 2004 19:47:05 -0000	1.157
+++ options.c	14 Jul 2004 22:27:59 -0000
@@ -133,7 +134,6 @@
 int always_checksum = 0;
 int list_only = 0;
 
-#define FIXED_CHECKSUM_SEED 32761
 #define MAX_BATCH_PREFIX_LEN 256	/* Must be less than MAXPATHLEN-13 */
 char *batch_prefix = NULL;
 
@@ -571,13 +571,11 @@
 		case OPT_WRITE_BATCH:
 			/* popt stores the filename in batch_prefix for us */
 			write_batch = 1;
-			checksum_seed = FIXED_CHECKSUM_SEED;
 			break;
 
 		case OPT_READ_BATCH:
 			/* popt stores the filename in batch_prefix for us */
 			read_batch = 1;
-			checksum_seed = FIXED_CHECKSUM_SEED;
 			break;
 
 		case OPT_TIMEOUT: