On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:17:36PM -0800, Craig Barratt wrote: > I suspect (but haven't checked) that if a 2.5.5 receiver is talking to > a 2.5.6 sender then 2.5.5 will send the index for the 3rd file, which > will be null_file on 2.5.6. FYI, I just ran a test, and indeed, this causes a seg fault. I'm working up a patch. ..wayne..