Server on small HDDs
James McNeill
james at heague.com.au
Tue Sep 17 14:13:02 EST 2002
A full install of RH 7.3 just to run samba seems a bit excessive. If
it's just a server you won't need 1.2gb for /usr. Go for a basic install
of Debian or so. Just to run as a file server shouldn't take up much
room at all.(well smaller than 1Gb)
If you want a bit more performance, you could devote an entire HDD to
swap. ;)
could then use the remaining HD to host the files you wish to share with
samba.
but go for software RAID if you want something more exciting!
-James
Scott D. Ferguson wrote:
>I would like to install Linux onto an old computer (P120) which has 3 hdds (2 x 1.2Gb 1 x 1Gb), and use it as a server for a small network (Samba but not Apache). Any suggestions for the most effecient way to partition the drives?
>
>I will probably use RedHat 7.3.
>I have previously partioned hda (1.2Gb) as 20Mb boot, 256MB swap and remainder as /.
>hdb (1Gb) as /var.
>hdc (1.2Gb) as /usr.
>
>With such limited space I would like to use the space more efficiently - should I try some sort of RAID arrangement? (RAID 0?)
>
>My programming skills are minimal, though I have lots of patience (have previously installed Debian on a PS/2 (MCA bus with no scuzzy drives).
>---
> TERMS AND CONDITIONS - PERSONAL DATA
>16.4 In processing Transactions , we may incidentally collect some limited personal data
> about your racial or ethnic origins, political opinions, religous or other beliefs,
> trade union membership, physical or mental health, sexual life or criminal record.
> You agree that we may use, disclose, transfer or sell those personal data as described in this condition.
>
>
>
>Is your boss reading your email? ....Probably
>Keep your messages private by using Lycos Mail.
>Sign up today at http://mail.lycos.com
>
>
>
>
More information about the linux
mailing list