[jcifs] Re: [Davenport-general] 0.9.7 failed, while 0.9.6 worked
Julian Reschke
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Feb 12 17:30:58 GMT 2004
eglass1 at comcast.net wrote:
>>No, in theory 302 upon OPTIONS and PROPFIND is fine (Apache/moddav2 does
>>the same). That certain webfolder versions do not follow these redirects
>>is simply a bug.
>>
>
>
> I was basing that on RFC 2068 (which actually doesn't forbid redirecting, just
> states that any requests other than GET or HEAD should prompt the user first).
> I couldn't find any documentation on the official behavior for a PROPFIND
> (being a WebDAV extension).
See...:
<http://skrb.org/ietf/http_errata.html#saferedirect>
--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
More information about the jcifs
mailing list