[distcc] PCH Headers and distcc (again!)
Fergus Henderson
fergus at google.com
Wed Jun 11 15:49:00 GMT 2008
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Jamie Kirkpatrick <jkp at kirkconsulting.co.uk>
wrote:
> Just to chime in:
>
> I still think PCH header support is essential. The problem is for projects
> that rely on them to a high degree to get decent compilation speeds
> already. If they disable PCH support and enable distcc, they then may not
> gain anything overall until adding maybe two equally powered boxes (in my
> experience). I understand that pump mode will help, but a combination of
> both would be most desirable.
>
> So the question is: is there a simple path to migrate this patch to the new
> code? Is the approach approved of? Does anyone have better ideas? Sascha:
> if they do agree to it being ported, can you do so?
I haven't looked at the patch in much detail yet, but I think the basic
approach seems reasonable.
--
Fergus Henderson <fergus at google.com>
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the distcc
mailing list