[distcc] avoiding work
Martin Pool
mbp at samba.org
Tue Feb 3 00:17:04 GMT 2004
On 2 Feb 2004, Grahame Bowland <grahame at angrygoats.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 08:40, Martin Pool wrote:
> > Useful and venerable though autoconf is, it's performance is pretty
> > terrible even on unix. One of the distcc benchmarks is GNU hello,
> > which takes about 15s to configure and 1s to compile.
>
> On this subject, has anyone heard of any useful autoconf replacement
> projects?
>
> It seems like one of those problems that really needs to be solved
> better, but is just too painful for anyone to get far, especially when
> the current solution mostly works.
SCons rocks:
http://distcc.samba.org/results.html#2003-01-28
--
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/attachments/20040203/e556816b/attachment.bin
More information about the distcc
mailing list