[ccache] Re: [Cachecc1-list] cachecc1
Ross Cameron
ross.cameron at linuxpro.co.za
Tue Apr 8 16:00:38 GMT 2008
I still use it for bulk building a LOT of packages for my embedded OS,
haven't needed to upgrade in AAAAAAAAGES but would appreciate the
project not dying off :(
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Simon Braunschmidt
<sbraunschmidt.linuxlists at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> is cachecc1 still supported or used?
>
> Last version is 0.3 from 2004.
>
> I used it for a while but now i tracked down a bug in the linux kernel
> build system for arm architecture to the usage of cachecc1. The bug
> was actually the resuse of binary data that did in fact change, but
> the assembler call for cachecc1 read it from cache.
>
> I can provide a detailed description of the steps to reproduce the
> bug, or compare:
> http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/msg/7ae8172becd5e51f
> (piggy.o gets wrongly compiled with data from cache)
>
> It seems that the cachecc1 project is effectively dead so I really
> recommend to make this clear on the link to it from ccache homepage.
>
> Best Regards
> Simon Braunschmidt
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m.,
> Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Cachecc1-list mailing list
> Cachecc1-list at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cachecc1-list
>
--
I have heard there are troubles of more than one kind.
Some come from ahead and some from behind.
But I've bought a big bat. I'm all ready you see.
Now my troubles are going to have toubles with me!
-- Dr. Seuss
More information about the ccache
mailing list